
BioAg
Demonstration
Location
Town, State, Country
Conducted by
Company
Yenda rice demonstration 2012
Your content goes here. Edit or remove this text inline or in the module Content settings. You can also style every aspect of this content in the module Design settings and even apply custom CSS to this text in the module Advanced settings.
Demonstration aim
To assess and measure pasture dry matter response over time, comparing BioAg treatments (annual and biennial) with annual treatments of single super phosphate (SSP).
Method
The trial site selected and soil tested in 2014 and then again in 2018 to look at nutrient run-down Treatments were then applied (hand spread) based on district standard treatment (125kg/ha SSP – 11kg phosphorus (P) per hectare per year):
- Nil
- SSP – annual application
- Superb – annual application
- Superb – biennial application
- BioAgPhos – annual application
- BioAgPhos – biennial application
The trial site did offer the opportunity to include 6 other replicated treatments; these were used to research other treatments and had no impact on the aim, purpose or conclusions of the trial.
Plots were mown on a cut and carry basis (i.e. all mown material was removed from plots). No stock grazing was allowed although there was some accidental grazing from lambs in the spring of 2016 – two cuts were lost.
Treatments were re-applied as needed on an annual or biennial basis. Total of 22 cuts were taken over a 4 year period finishing in the autumn of 2018. Forage quality tests were also taken in the spring of 2017.
Yield results per treatment per year (T/Ha)
Planning
Objective
Activity
BioAg Product
Prior to sowing
Objective
Activity
BioAg Product
“A soil test is a low-cost and highly effective management tool that will identify impediments to your production goals.”

Your content goes here. Edit or remove this text inline or in the module Content settings. You can also style every aspect of this content in the module Design settings and even apply custom CSS to this text in the module Advanced settings.
Results
At the end of the trial the two Superb treatments produced more dry matter than SSP. SSP produced the third-highest amount of dry matter, better than both BioAgPhos treatments while all treatments out-performed the nil treatment. The treatments containing Sulfur (SSP and the two Superb treatments) were significantly better than the straight phosphate products (BioAgPhos).
Conclusion
Dry matter production on the plots receiving a biennial (every second year) application of Superb was the highest, however not statistically different than for annual applications of either Superb or SSP. The trials aims were achieved and showed that both annual and biennial applications were as effective as SSP in the production of dry matter. The trial also highlighted the benefit of fertiliser in growing additional feed, and that the use of fertiliser was more economical than the buying of feed. The cost of feed production was lowest with biennial applications of Superb.

Download demonstration
For the full demonstration, including methods, results and conclusion, download here.
Recent Comments